Offence called companion snacks The courts have established the Supreme
"Yet another decision that will discuss the one issued by the Supreme Court: it is an offense to the" companion snacks "to someone. The term had come into vogue in the '90s after the trials to Peter Pacciani and his companions. Therefore made final sentence for defamation against John M., former president of the Province of Ragusa, "for having offended the reputation of a provincial council."
The former president had said that the provincial council, along with two other people just DefInt "fellow snacks", of which a collaborator of justice "had built a house of charges against him, leading to the arrest."
sentenced by the Court of Appeal of Messina, in November 2004 for defamation, John M. he addressed the Supreme Court and, in calling for a reduction of sentence, argued that he had done nothing more than "defend themselves against unlawful and unjust machine that has been as a corrupt politician and profit. "
The Supreme Court (6699) dismissed the appeal, stressing that" the expression and negative connotations of allusive 'mates snacks "used by the former President of the Province of Ragusa in the press conference" looks like suggestive and ironic synonymous with people of ill repute who plot in secret. "Why, still remembers Piazza Cavour, it is true that the" political criticism can also be harsh and biting, it can not 'never transcends measure in mockery, in the attack and disparaging virulent, "also contained in the expression 'fellow snacks'."
Following this news, I can not help but change its name, with the new Government would not want to find myself in some CPT soon:-D
Now I am no longer Companion Companion snacks but lunches and dinners (which also suits me even more) but I'll just be friends blogghisti Companion .
0 comments:
Post a Comment